You Vote: Will SCOTUS ruling on injunctions end the attempts by judges to block Trump’s orders?

image

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday found that the lower courts likely lacked the authority to impose universal injunctions and instead limited them to protect the plaintiff parties.

“The issuance of a universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power,” wrote Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch joined her opinion. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas concurred.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in her opinion for the majority, issued a scathing rebuke of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, asserting she sought an “imperial judiciary” and that her views ran afoul of more than 200 years of precedent.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.